Sabina_Hussaini
Community Manager
Community Manager

09.23.26.pngOn Sept. 23, 2026, the Global Google Educator Group hosted a webinar titled "Critical Fluencies: Reading, Writing, and Algorithms in the Modern Classroom," focusing on digital literacy in modern education. Hosted by Sheila Escobedo, Director of Learning and Teaching at Colegio Decroly Americano in Guatemala, the session featured Rodvin Morales (Instagram @rodvinmorales), a Spanish and literature educator and secondary department coordinator at the same institution. The central takeaway of the discussion was that artificial intelligence must not replace fundamental literacy. Instead, technology should serve as a strategic partner that fosters critical thinking, deepens reading comprehension, and scaffolds writing through clear pedagogical boundaries.

The recording of the event is embedded directly at the bottom of this post for educators who wish to watch the session in Spanish; for English-speaking members, this recap provides a full breakdown of the strategies, routines, and frameworks shared by the panel.

Rather than viewing artificial intelligence with apprehension, the speakers advocated for a transparent, problem-first approach to classroom integration. By pairing structured AI prompting models with collaborative peer analysis, educators can move students beyond passive copy-pasting and turn them into critical evaluators of digital algorithms.

Critical Inquiry and Theoretical Grounding with Gemini

Morales opened the discussion by addressing the challenge of preventing students from treating AI as an automated answer machine. In his literature classes, Morales introduced an instructional routine for the "Literary Café," where students analyze Miguel Ángel Asturias's novel El Señor Presidente. Rather than using AI to generate interpretations of the text directly, students must investigate only the underlying theoretical framework—such as the artistic traits of the avant-garde or historical definitions of literary devices—without mentioning the novel's title in their prompts.

Students then validate the AI-generated responses against classroom texts, verify source links, format bibliographic citations using APA standards, and locate physical textual evidence in the novel itself.

"It's about raising awareness among the students... so that it's not just a transfer of artificial intelligence to their work, but that they actually apply critical thinking," Morales said. "When they investigate on their own without consulting artificial intelligence, sometimes they get a little lost, they don't focus... [Gemini] allows them to stay within the boundaries they are working on in the critical analysis."

Escobedo reinforced this strategy by demonstrating the integration of Gemini Notebooks inside Google Classroom. By curating bounded repositories of up to 50 reliable sources—such as documents on the circular economy and Guatemala’s National Sustainable Development Plan 2032—teachers create a structured environment where students can query sources critically while maintaining universal design for learning.

The AI Traffic Light: Regulating Agency and Ethical Production

To guide students from passive consumption to transparent creation, Morales shared a five-level AI Traffic Light system adapted from academic research and implemented across secondary classrooms and graduating research seminars:

  • No AI (Red): Generative tools are entirely prohibited during initial concept generation. Brainstorming and early drafts must be executed by hand in the classroom to ensure authentic voice.
  • AI-Assisted Idea Generation and Structuring (Orange): Students use AI to refine ideas, identify counter-perspectives, or outline a theoretical framework, requiring explicit APA or MLA tool citations.
  • AI-Assisted Editing (Yellow): AI is restricted to reviewing finalized student drafts for grammar, syntax, spelling, and tone.
  • Task Completion with Human Evaluation (Light Green): Students generate specific components using AI but must critically evaluate the output against a teacher checklist and rubric.
  • Full AI (Dark Green): Students have open access to AI tools to produce final multimedia artifacts, such as digital presentations, podcasts, and video assets, after completing their human-centered research.

Morales stressed that posting these visual stages on the classroom wall establishes clear boundaries, helping students understand exactly which cognitive tasks belong to them and where algorithmic assistance is permitted.

Collaborative Reading Levels: From Panoramas to Meta-Reading

Addressing the impact of digital media and misinformation, the panel presented collaborative routines to deepen textual engagement. Morales outlined four progressive tiers of strategic reading:

  1. Panoramic Reading: Skimming titles, images, and structure to gain an initial overview.
  2. Analytical-Synthetic Reading: Deconstructing arguments, identifying textual relationships, and examining structural design.
  3. Critical-Evaluative Reading: Formulating defended opinions by connecting text concepts to external contexts and prior knowledge.
  4. Meta-Reading: Reflecting metacognitively on one's own reading habits to identify comprehension gaps and adapt.

To practice these tiers collaboratively, Morales detailed an in-person rotation called the "Interview Train," where students divide a topic into four sections, interview peers across rotational pairings, and synthesize findings.

Digitally, this was mirrored through shared Google Slides presentations on Spanish American Neoclassicism. By simultaneously commenting and answering peer questions in the comment threads, students debated the Counter-Enlightenment and Enlightenment philosophy in real time, moving beyond passive absorption into peer evaluation.

"It's a big commitment for us as teachers to connect with and regulate this element, and to try to use the tools that technology provides for good," Morales noted. "Let's not be afraid of technology. I think it's a matter of having a strategy, of being discerning, of taking advantage of technology to further improve critical thinking."

Practical Takeaways for Primary and Secondary Educators

  • Model Theoretical AI Prompting: When assigning research, instruct students to prompt AI for the underlying academic concepts or literary theories rather than asking for direct analysis of a specific book or prompt.
  • Establish Transparent AI Traffic Lights: Display a clear multi-tiered scale in your classroom defining where AI is prohibited (e.g., initial drafts) and where it is allowed (e.g., grammar editing or visual layout).
  • Scaffold Reading Across Four Tiers: Guide students deliberately from initial skimming (panoramic) to critical evaluation and metacognitive reflection (meta-reading) across all subjects.
  • Curate Bounded Digital Environments: Use Gemini Notebooks or Google Drive folders to limit student research to verified, high-quality sources, preventing information overload and unstructured copy-pasting.

Shared Event Resources

Related Google AI Educator Series Content

To build upon the pedagogical strategies shared during this session, explore these self-paced, educator-centered courses from the free Google AI Educator Series, developed in partnership with ISTE+ASCD:

  • Evaluate Resources and Claims: Learn structured methods for teaching information literacy. This lesson directly reinforces Rodvin Morales's framework for verifying AI-generated claims against primary source texts and requiring verifiable source links.
  • Design Assessments That Capture Student Thinking: This course shows teachers how to craft assessments that evaluate student reasoning and iteration rather than static final outputs. This aligns with the AI Traffic Light model, ensuring students demonstrate authentic learning in hand-written initial drafts and peer discussions.
  • Adapt (Level) Materials to Meet Student Needs: Discover strategies for adapting text complexity and reading tiers. This module connects with Sheila Escobedo's demonstration of Read Along in Google Classroom, showing how to scaffold reading comprehension for diverse grade bands.

What's Next?

This content was created by a human and refined by Gemini.

Event Recording

1 Comment