This is a fantastic and incredibly timely topic. Honestly, it gets right to the heart of what we're trying to build with the Ohio Gemini AI Educators program. When I talk to teachers across the state, I see two reactions to AI. The first is fearโthe worry that AI will become the ultimate "easy button," killing curiosity and critical thinking. The fear that students will just ask it for the answer and call it a day. And that's a valid concern if we don't change our approach. But the second reaction, the one that gets me excited, is the one this topic points to. What if, instead of an answer machine, we treat AI as an "inquiry engine"? I was working with a high school history teacher just last month who completely reframed how her students approach their research papers. Instead of having them ask the AI, "Write me an essay about the causes of the Dust Bowl," she had them start with a totally different kind of prompt. She had them ask, "You are a farmer in Oklahoma in 1934. Describe your life and your biggest challenges. Now, you are a government soil scientist from the same period. What are you observing and what are you recommending?" The difference was night and day. The students weren't getting answers; they were gathering perspectives. They were using the AI as a simulator to fuel their own questions and build a much deeper, more empathetic understanding of the topic. They were still the ones doing the thinking, the synthesizing, and the writing. The AI just became a powerful new partner in their inquiry.
That's the shift we have to make. It's less about the prompts we give the AI and more about the questions we teach our students to ask of the world. For me, this is the most exciting opportunity in education right now.
I'd love to knowโwhat's one way you've seen a student's question change for the better when using a tool like Gemini?
I build AI on Google Cloud. It's like teaching rocks to think, but the rocks are distributed globally and bill by the second.