<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Seeing the &amp;quot;Mouse Bites&amp;quot; in our Silicon: The End of the &amp;quot;Black Box&amp;quot; in Hardware in Engineering &amp; CS GFG</title>
    <link>https://www.googleforeducommunity.com/t5/Engineering-CS-GFG/Seeing-the-quot-Mouse-Bites-quot-in-our-Silicon-The-End-of-the/m-p/212113#M2</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cornell researchers just revealed a technique called &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;electron ptychography&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; that allows us to see&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/03/260305182657.htm" target="_blank"&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;atomic-scale flaws ("mouse bites")&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; inside 3D transistors for the first time.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For decades, software engineers have treated hardware as a perfect abstraction—if the code is right, the execution is guaranteed. With our new ability to map 'atomic flaws' in real-time, should we start designing hardware-aware software that can bypass specific physical defects in a chip? Or does this break the fundamental layers of abstraction that make modern CS possible?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:32:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dlaufenberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-03-12T15:32:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Seeing the "Mouse Bites" in our Silicon: The End of the "Black Box" in Hardware</title>
      <link>https://www.googleforeducommunity.com/t5/Engineering-CS-GFG/Seeing-the-quot-Mouse-Bites-quot-in-our-Silicon-The-End-of-the/m-p/212113#M2</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Cornell researchers just revealed a technique called &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;electron ptychography&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; that allows us to see&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/03/260305182657.htm" target="_blank"&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;atomic-scale flaws ("mouse bites")&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; inside 3D transistors for the first time.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For decades, software engineers have treated hardware as a perfect abstraction—if the code is right, the execution is guaranteed. With our new ability to map 'atomic flaws' in real-time, should we start designing hardware-aware software that can bypass specific physical defects in a chip? Or does this break the fundamental layers of abstraction that make modern CS possible?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 15:32:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.googleforeducommunity.com/t5/Engineering-CS-GFG/Seeing-the-quot-Mouse-Bites-quot-in-our-Silicon-The-End-of-the/m-p/212113#M2</guid>
      <dc:creator>dlaufenberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-12T15:32:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

