<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re-Vitalizing the &amp;quot;Mid-Career Gap&amp;quot; in Career &amp; Tenure-Stream GFG</title>
    <link>https://www.googleforeducommunity.com/t5/Career-Tenure-Stream-GFG/Re-Vitalizing-the-quot-Mid-Career-Gap-quot/m-p/221444#M3</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The "mid-career slump" triggered by exceptional administrative and service burdens post-tenure has become a topic of conversation as of late. New grant structures, such as those implemented for the 2025-2026 cycle at institutions like Chapman University, specifically target tenured faculty seeking to re-vitalize their research after years of heavy departmental service.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Question:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; Should universities formalize "Research Re-vitalization" tracks for tenured faculty who have sacrificed personal scholarship for institutional service?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The Debate:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; Does prioritizing these grants for "service-heavy" faculty undermine the meritocratic nature of traditional research funding?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Relevant Link:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.chapman.edu/research/_files/fgrsc_25-26_guidelines_final.pdf" target="_blank"&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;Faculty Grant for Research and Scholarship 2025/2026&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 16:23:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dlaufenberg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-02T16:23:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Re-Vitalizing the "Mid-Career Gap"</title>
      <link>https://www.googleforeducommunity.com/t5/Career-Tenure-Stream-GFG/Re-Vitalizing-the-quot-Mid-Career-Gap-quot/m-p/221444#M3</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The "mid-career slump" triggered by exceptional administrative and service burdens post-tenure has become a topic of conversation as of late. New grant structures, such as those implemented for the 2025-2026 cycle at institutions like Chapman University, specifically target tenured faculty seeking to re-vitalize their research after years of heavy departmental service.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Question:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; Should universities formalize "Research Re-vitalization" tracks for tenured faculty who have sacrificed personal scholarship for institutional service?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The Debate:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; Does prioritizing these grants for "service-heavy" faculty undermine the meritocratic nature of traditional research funding?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Relevant Link:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.chapman.edu/research/_files/fgrsc_25-26_guidelines_final.pdf" target="_blank"&gt; &lt;SPAN&gt;Faculty Grant for Research and Scholarship 2025/2026&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 16:23:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.googleforeducommunity.com/t5/Career-Tenure-Stream-GFG/Re-Vitalizing-the-quot-Mid-Career-Gap-quot/m-p/221444#M3</guid>
      <dc:creator>dlaufenberg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-02T16:23:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

